01718nas a2200241   4500000000100000008004100001260007100042653002600113653001300139653004800152653001200200653001500212100001900227700001500246700001600261700002600277700001200303700001400315700001400329245016200343300001200505520095900517       2020                            d  bLinnaeus University, University of SheffieldaKalmar and Sheffield10aabnormal test results10abad news10apatient accessible electronic health record10apatient10aphysicians1 aHanife Rexhepi1 aJonas Moll1 aIsto Huvila1 aRose-Mharie Åhlfeldt1 aP. Bath1 aP. Jokela1 aL. Sbaffi00aDo you want to receive bad news through your patient accessible electronic health record? A national survey on receiving bad news in an era of digital health  a169-1783 aDespite the fact that patient accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) have been around for many years in several countries, there is a lack of research investigating patient \0x0301 preferences for receiving bad news, including through PAEHRs. Little is also known about the characteristics of the patients who prefer to receive bad news through the PAEHR in terms of e.g. medical diagnosis, age and educational level. This study, based on a national patient survey in Sweden (N=2587), investigated this. Results show that, generally, receiving bad news by reading in the PAEHR is still among the least preferred options. Additionally, a higher proportion of men want to receive bad news in the PAEHR compared to women (p=0.001), and the same goes for those who are not working/have worked in healthcare (p=0.007). An effect of disease groups was also found, showing that diabetes patients in particular, want to receive bad news through the PAEHR.